Result

46.8 Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å

DiffDock-L · Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å · LiPP lipid–protein complexes

Tested configuration: DiffDock-L
Task: Lipid–protein binding pose
Dataset: LiPP lipid–protein complexes
Related family profiles: DiffDock-L
Procedure: Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å.
Evaluation: DiffDock-L: Lipid–protein binding pose
Coverage: scored: unreported; eligible: unreported
Uncertainty: 95% CI 41.3–52.3
Evidence: Independent external evaluation · source checkedThe LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: needs review. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split: Not reported
Adaptation: Not reported
Scoring implementation: Not reported

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Access requirements and official instructions: Lipid–protein binding pose

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
attributes.printed_value 46.8 Individual claims	The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods Original source ↗ Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column Version: PMC13292216.1 Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.548973+00:00	source checked independent ai table review · 2026-09-16T10:41:16.550691+00:00 independent paper Audit details JATS label is bare 2, which caused original parser miss. LiPP N=331 full-set column selected, not N=36 test subset. Caption success is lipid all-atom RMSD <2 Angstrom; PB-valid is a separate table. This verifies the central score at its source location, not every metadata field or an experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.printed_value` Claim: claim-lit-042 Source artifact SHA-256: `6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact Extraction artifact SHA-256: `6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e` Extraction artifact

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release history

The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Original source · PMC13292216.1

Download this release

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lit-042

areas: molecular-interactions
tasks: Lipid–protein binding pose
printed value: 46.8
numeric value: 46.8
metric: Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å
metric direction: unknown
unit: %
uncertainty: 95% CI 41.3–52.3
source locator: Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column
review: method: independent_ai_table_review; reviewer: Codex omics research agent; independent source-table review, not human review; reviewed at: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.550691+00:00; notes: JATS label is bare 2, which caused original parser miss. LiPP N=331 full-set column selected, not N=36 test subset. Caption success is lipid all-atom RMSD <2 Angstrom; PB-valid is a separate table. This verifies the central score at its source location, not every metadata field or an experimental reproduction.; evidence: {"table_xml_id": "tbl2", "row_cells": ["DiffDock-L", "46.8 {41.3–52.3}", "30.5 {16.3–48.1}", "-", "50"], "selected_cell_zero_based": 1, "selected_cell_xml": "<td align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">46.8 {41.3–52.3}</td>", "caption": "Success Rates (Success Defined Only by Lipid Pose All-Atom RMSD Cutoff Values Less Than 2 Å) of the Five Computational Methods Used in This Study on Lipid–Protein Complexes (via LiPP Benchmark Set) Compared to Protein-Small Molecule Complexes (via PoseBusters Benchmark Set)"}; artifact sha256: 6ff34f2f709a14858a3753abf9f8f6efa1e7e3c351f15c70cf64264193a9414e; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13292216/fullTextXML
legacy id: lit-042
legacy row: id: lit-042; paper id: lipp-2026; domain id: molecular-interactions; task: Lipid–protein binding pose; model: DiffDock-L; model version: Not reported; dataset: LiPP lipid–protein complexes; dataset version: 331 complexes; split: Not reported; metric: Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å; value: 46.8; unit: %; uncertainty: 95% CI 41.3–52.3; protocol: Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å.; source locator: Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column; source url: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13292216/; evaluation origin: independent_paper; reviewed utc: 2026-09-15T23:25:00Z
missing metadata: model version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract

Related records

evaluation: DiffDock-L: Lipid–protein binding pose
subject: Reported Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å for DiffDock-L

Suggest a correction