rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Protocol

FRASER Kremer cohort known pathogenic-event subsampling

FRASER Kremer cohort known pathogenic-event subsampling; bounded primary-source AMP candidate.

1 evaluation · 2 results

Overview

FRASER Kremer cohort known pathogenic-event subsampling; bounded primary-source AMP candidate.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

1 recorded evaluation, 2 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

1 evaluation · 2 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: FRASER (2021 article implementation)Protocol: FRASER Kremer cohort known pathogenic-event subsampling
Dataset: Kremer rare mitochondrial-disorder skin-fibroblast RNA cohort
85% mean known pathogenic splicing-event recovery at 30 samples
% · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FRASER (2021 article implementation) evaluation

Randomly remove samples without known pathogenic splicing defect; measure fraction of 13 known events recovered at reduced cohort size. At 30 samples, 85% / mean 11 of 13; 100 samples needed to recover all irrespective of selected samples. FRASER controls latent confounding and models beta-binomial count fractions; cohort analysis uses FDR<0.1 and |effect|>0.3.

Aggregation: Not reported

Detection of aberrant splicing events in RNA-seq data using FRASER · Results subsection rare disease cohort, paragraph Par18; Supplementary Fig. S20 referenced
Configuration: FRASER (2021 article implementation)Protocol: FRASER Kremer cohort known pathogenic-event subsampling
Dataset: Kremer rare mitochondrial-disorder skin-fibroblast RNA cohort
11 mean recovered known pathogenic events at 30 samples
events · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FRASER (2021 article implementation) evaluation

Randomly remove samples without known pathogenic splicing defect; measure fraction of 13 known events recovered at reduced cohort size. At 30 samples, 85% / mean 11 of 13; 100 samples needed to recover all irrespective of selected samples. FRASER controls latent confounding and models beta-binomial count fractions; cohort analysis uses FDR<0.1 and |effect|>0.3.

Aggregation: Not reported

Detection of aberrant splicing events in RNA-seq data using FRASER · Results Par18; Supplementary Fig. S20 referenced

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations
1

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: amp-oncology-rna-20261007-protocol-fraser-kremer-subsampling

areas
dna-genomes
method types
conventional_pipeline
missing metadata
None recorded
scope note
Direct patient-RNA known-event recovery does not establish prospective diagnostic accuracy or patient outcome benefit. Known pathogenic-event ascertainment and same-cohort retrospective selection can bias recovery. 30 is RNA sample subset size; do not silently equate to 30 independent patients. No blinded pathogenicity adjudication, general tissue transfer, VUS reclassification sensitivity or transcriptome-wide precision established by this endpoint. Subsampling repeats, exact score aggregation and numeric uncertainty unavailable from inspected main-text endpoint; supplementary PDF DNS retrieval failed. FRASER author correction 2022 changes GTEx version V7 to V6p; patient-Kremer endpoint not affected according to correction search result; exact correction bytes not retrieved.
task
Randomly remove samples without known pathogenic splicing defect; measure fraction of 13 known events recovered at reduced cohort size. At 30 samples, 85% / mean 11 of 13; 100 samples needed to recover all irrespective of selected samples. FRASER controls latent confounding and models beta-binomial count fractions; cohort analysis uses FDR<0.1 and |effect|>0.3.
version
2021 article corrected 2022, Par18
Related records

Suggest a correction